9.27.2004
Carter sets the stage?
Could be. He writes an opinion for the Monday WaPo edition in which he claims "The disturbing fact is that a repetition of the problems of 2000 now seems likely, even as many other nations are conducting elections that are internationally certified to be transparent, honest and fair. "
Our former President continues his unprecedented foray into bitter partisan politics this year. He says Florida has not achieved a 'nonpartisan election commission' or 'uniform voting procedures', two crucial components required for a fair and balanced election.
It was obvious that in 2000 these basic standards were not met in Florida, and there are disturbing signs that once again, as we prepare for a presidential election, some of the state's leading officials hold strong political biases that prevent necessary reforms.
He accuses Florida Secretary of State Glenda Hood of bias. She's Republican, so what? What political affiliation did U.S. Secretary of State Madeline Albright hold? Ms. Hood is constitutionally sworn to uphold the law (not doing so can get her in trouble, no?). Where did the trouble in 2000 occur? In heavily Democratic areas, that's where. In heavily Democratic areas under the control of Democratic operatives! So, if basic standards were not being met...
Several thousand ballots of African Americans were thrown out on technicalities in 2000, and a fumbling attempt has been made recently to disqualify 22,000 African Americans (likely Democrats), but only 61 Hispanics (likely Republicans), as alleged felons.
Really, Mr Carter? What were the technicalities? Why didn't you elaborate upon the 'fumbling attempt' to disqualify all of those people. Are you accusing someone of racism? If you are, who? Convicted felons are disqualified everyday from exercising their right to vote -- it is a sanction for committing serious crime, sir. Why only 61 Hispanics? No words there...
Carter wants "maximum public scrutiny" in Florida at election time. Fine. I want somebody watching the lawyers.
Here is an example of liberal snowballing: This editorial has become 'news'. Check out this gleeful BBC story.
Could be. He writes an opinion for the Monday WaPo edition in which he claims "The disturbing fact is that a repetition of the problems of 2000 now seems likely, even as many other nations are conducting elections that are internationally certified to be transparent, honest and fair. "
Our former President continues his unprecedented foray into bitter partisan politics this year. He says Florida has not achieved a 'nonpartisan election commission' or 'uniform voting procedures', two crucial components required for a fair and balanced election.
It was obvious that in 2000 these basic standards were not met in Florida, and there are disturbing signs that once again, as we prepare for a presidential election, some of the state's leading officials hold strong political biases that prevent necessary reforms.
He accuses Florida Secretary of State Glenda Hood of bias. She's Republican, so what? What political affiliation did U.S. Secretary of State Madeline Albright hold? Ms. Hood is constitutionally sworn to uphold the law (not doing so can get her in trouble, no?). Where did the trouble in 2000 occur? In heavily Democratic areas, that's where. In heavily Democratic areas under the control of Democratic operatives! So, if basic standards were not being met...
Several thousand ballots of African Americans were thrown out on technicalities in 2000, and a fumbling attempt has been made recently to disqualify 22,000 African Americans (likely Democrats), but only 61 Hispanics (likely Republicans), as alleged felons.
Really, Mr Carter? What were the technicalities? Why didn't you elaborate upon the 'fumbling attempt' to disqualify all of those people. Are you accusing someone of racism? If you are, who? Convicted felons are disqualified everyday from exercising their right to vote -- it is a sanction for committing serious crime, sir. Why only 61 Hispanics? No words there...
Carter wants "maximum public scrutiny" in Florida at election time. Fine. I want somebody watching the lawyers.
Here is an example of liberal snowballing: This editorial has become 'news'. Check out this gleeful BBC story.
// posted by HunterByrd @ 1:01 PM 
Comments:
<< Home
"He accuses Florida Secretary of State Glenda Hood of bias. She's Republican, so what? What political affiliation did U.S. Secretary of State Madeline Albright hold?"
Whaaa?
It's the most apples and orange comparison I've ever heard in my life. The U.S. Secretary of State is in charge of foreign policy. State Secretaries of State run things like elections. Now, having a very partisan republican running an election (or for that matter a partisan democrat) is a very different matter than a partisan carrying out an already elected President's policies.
Whaaa?
It's the most apples and orange comparison I've ever heard in my life. The U.S. Secretary of State is in charge of foreign policy. State Secretaries of State run things like elections. Now, having a very partisan republican running an election (or for that matter a partisan democrat) is a very different matter than a partisan carrying out an already elected President's policies.
# posted by 
: 2:22 PM
: 2:22 PM
"It's the most apples and orange comparison I've ever heard in my life."
Why is that? Granted the State of Florida's constitution is not the same as the Constitution of the United States. I give you that. Furthermore, I grant you that the two positions are not the same. However, each office is a constitutional office. Each office is ultimately accountable to the public. That was my angle.
Furthermore, each respective officeholder is either a registered Republican or a Democrat. They therefore have their own personal bias. How about you, Anonymous?
That aside, they must prosecute the duties of their respective offices, regardless of their personal bias. Do you disagree with this?
I happen to believe the Florida SofS will do just that. I would, if had the MSM breathing down my neck...heck, I would if the mass media didn't know my name. What's so difficult with that concept? It's called honor and integrity.
Post a Comment
Why is that? Granted the State of Florida's constitution is not the same as the Constitution of the United States. I give you that. Furthermore, I grant you that the two positions are not the same. However, each office is a constitutional office. Each office is ultimately accountable to the public. That was my angle.
Furthermore, each respective officeholder is either a registered Republican or a Democrat. They therefore have their own personal bias. How about you, Anonymous?
That aside, they must prosecute the duties of their respective offices, regardless of their personal bias. Do you disagree with this?
I happen to believe the Florida SofS will do just that. I would, if had the MSM breathing down my neck...heck, I would if the mass media didn't know my name. What's so difficult with that concept? It's called honor and integrity.
<< Home
