10.25.2004

Hugh's take

"Kerry&Co. have been trying to run up the middle for 3 quarters and 12 minutes, and they have negative yards rushing. So what do they do? Run up the middle. Among the worst campaigns in American political history. " Check out a biggie take.

That's bold. Kerry's campaign hasn't been run as well as it could have been (my feelings aren't hurt, mind you). Neither has W's, but I have enjoyed his (too few) hard hits. The Dukakis campaign was laughable. Mondale's campaign was high comedy, and the final vote bore it out. This final vote will not bear out Kerry's incompetence. That's my prediction.

My prayer is this: The final tally will be not close enough to permit valid bickering of any sort.

Heaven forbid it falls to Kerry. In the unlikely event it does, we conservatives have enough red meat to last us the rest of our natural born lives. Right-of-center bloggers and commenters will blog and speak on, hard. The truth is what it is; won't change. We conservatives have, and will always be possessed of, the correct slant. Liberals may be masters of the slant, the 'emotive', but American conservatives are masters of rational reality. The 'world' be damned. This is today.

In the likely event George W. pulls it off, the hatred of the left will intensify. It is not my intent to 'smirk' as the libbies like to say. Instead, I intend to join my like-minded brothers and sisters in the 'eternal vigilance' of our cause, i.e., the extension of freedom in all its myriad forms, of mind and heart, even if it 'hurts'...

By the way, I watched Kerry on TV for a moment tonight at a Bill Clinton Philly love-fest. Kerry was pounding away about the 380 tons of stolen explosives in Iraq. The Bush administation's failure to "guard those stockpiles" is too much to take. "This is one of the great blunders of Iraq, one of the great blunders of this administration," Kerry said. George didn't have his eye on that dynamite, folks, because he's incompetent to be your President! It's fallen into the hands of terrorists!

Drudge tallies at least 98 mentions of it in the MSM today. Fair and balanced, you know.

Dem vp hopeful John Edwards blasted Bush for not securing the explosives: "It is reckless and irresponsible to fail to protect and safeguard one of the largest weapons sites in the country. And by either ignoring these mistakes or being clueless about them, George Bush has failed. He has failed as our commander in chief; he has failed as president.

OUCH!

But tonight, NBCNEWS reported, once: The 380 tons of powerful conventional explosives were already missing back in April 10, 2003 -- when U.S. troops arrived at the installation south of Baghdad!

A senior Bush official e-mailed DRUDGE late Monday: "Let me get this straight, are Mr. Kerry and Mr. Edwards now saying we did not go into Iraq soon enough? We should have invaded and liberated Iraq sooner?"

OOOH!

Keep faith folks. This interchange DOES play well with Hugh Biggie's prognostication.

UPDATE: Hugh interviewed former NYC Police Commissioner Bernard Kerick on 10/26. Kerick was in Iraq for four months, from the time Baghdad fell.

"What John Kerry doesn't know or doesn't understand is that we seized more than 280,000 tons that were detonated already. We seized another 160,000 tons that are pending detonation."

Who are John Kerry and and his cronies that they would make such a big deal of 380 tonnes?

Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?